Main Menu
Taxpayers Take a Hit in the Washington Capital Gains Tax Battle

By motion dated November 3, 2022, the Washington State Attorney General asked the Supreme Court of the State of Washington to allow the Washington Department of Revenue to implement and collect the capital gains tax struck down as unconstitutional by the Douglas County Superior Court, pending the high court’s ultimate ruling on the matter. 

As previously reported, the tax, which was set to go into effect on January 1, 2022 was struck down by the Douglas County Superior Court as unconstitutional.  The first tax payments under the new tax regime would be due on April 17, 2023.

The state appealed the lower court’s ruling that the tax violates the Washington State Constitution.  The Washington Supreme Court accepted the state’s direct appeal to the high court bypassing the Court of Appeals.  The case has been fully briefed by the parties and is set for oral argument on January 26, 2023.

The state argued that the lower court’s ruling was erroneous and that waiting for the Supreme Court to ultimately rule on the matter puts the vital goal of the tax (i.e., to help fund education) in jeopardy.  As a consequence, it asked the court to allow it to implement and collect the tax pending the outcome of the case. 

In a brief order of the Supreme Court, on November 30, 2022, Chief Justice Steven Charles Gonzalez delivered the court’s ruling that the lower court order is stayed pending the ultimate resolution of the matter.  He states that the decision was unanimous among the court’s justices. 

What this means for taxpayers subject to the Washington capital gains tax is that they are required to report and pay the tax by April 17, 2023.  In the interim, the Washington Department of Revenue plans to issue administrative rules to provide guidance to taxpayers relative to the tax and it will publish tax forms to facilitate reporting and payment of the tax.

Lots of questions remain, including:

  1. It seems strange that, given a court of competent jurisdiction ruled the tax is unconstitutional, a higher court would later rule that the tax can be administered and collected prior to its ultimate ruling on the matter. Is the November 30, 2022 ruling of the Washington Supreme Court a signal that the justices on the court are leaning in favor of reversing the lower court even before they have heard oral argument?
  2. Will the Washington Supreme Court issue its ultimate decision in the case before the April 17, 2023 filing and payment deadline? Given the recessionary times we are experiencing, it seems harsh to require taxpayers to come out of pocket and pay a tax that may ultimately be ruled as unconstitutional.
  3. If the court strikes down the tax, but does so after the time for filing and payment of the tax, will there be an expedited refund procedure put in place by the state?

I will report more on this tax once the Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments and renders its ultimate decision in the case.      

Search This Blog

Subscribe

RSS RSS Feed

Larry J. Brant
Editor

Larry J. Brant is a Shareholder and the Chair of the Tax & Benefits practice group at Foster Garvey, a law firm based out of the Pacific Northwest, with offices in Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Washington, D.C.; New York, New York, Spokane, Washington; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Beijing, China. Mr. Brant is licensed to practice in Oregon and Washington. His practice focuses on tax, tax controversy and transactions. Mr. Brant is a past Chair of the Oregon State Bar Taxation Section. He was the long-term Chair of the Oregon Tax Institute, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Portland Tax Forum. Mr. Brant has served as an adjunct professor, teaching corporate taxation, at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College. He is an Expert Contributor to Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Catalyst. Mr. Brant is a Fellow in the American College of Tax Counsel. He publishes articles on numerous income tax issues, including Taxation of S Corporations, Reasonable Compensation, Circular 230, Worker Classification, IRC § 1031 Exchanges, Choice of Entity, Entity Tax Classification, and State and Local Taxation. Mr. Brant is a frequent lecturer at local, regional and national tax and business conferences for CPAs and attorneys. He was the 2015 Recipient of the Oregon State Bar Tax Section Award of Merit.

Recent Posts

Topics

Select Category:

Archives

Select Month:

Upcoming Speaking Engagements

Contributors

Back to Page

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of cookies. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Policy.