As reported in my January 21, 2014 blog post, federal budget cuts continue to hit the IRS hard. In the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014, our lawmakers cut the Service’s budget by more than $500 million. The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015, signed by President Obama on September 19, 2014, gave the Service about a $350 million budget setback.
While it is hard to debate the need for government budget cuts these days, deciding where to make the cuts is surely a difficult endeavor. Nevertheless, perplexing as it may be, lawmakers find it necessary and appropriate to cut the funding of the IRS, a division of our government that collects revenue. Making these budget decisions even more baffling, we currently have an annual tax gap in this country of over $450 billion. Adequately funding the IRS so that it can enforce our tax laws, thereby reducing the annual tax gap, should be a given. Apparently, it is not a given to our lawmakers.
Of interesting note, the annual tax gap has increased by approximately $150 billion since 2001. Yet, the IRS has had its budget slashed by over $1 billion in the last five (5) years.
According to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, the funding of the IRS this fiscal year ending September 30 is back to the 2008 funding level. He suggests the results will be felt by taxpayers and tax advisors, including:
- At least 46,000 fewer business and individual audits will conclude this fiscal year;
- Taxpayers will encounter about a thirty (30) minute wait when calling a service center to reach an IRS representative;
- 3,000 to 4,000 IRS employees will lose their jobs and there is the possibility that employee furlough days will be implemented this fiscal year, reducing the ability of the IRS to provide taxpayer service;
- Approximately 280,000 or more fewer collections will be made this fiscal year;
- IT systems will not be replaced or updated this fiscal year as scheduled; and
- Implementation of taxpayer identification theft protections will have to be delayed until a future fiscal year.
Commissioner Koskinen predicts these most recent IRS budget cuts will ultimately result in a loss of $2 billion or more in tax revenue that would have otherwise been collected this fiscal year. WOW!
These budget cuts remind me of a story I heard about a top salesperson who worked for a successful manufacturer and was consistently responsible for the vast majority of the company’s sales. He was paid solely on a commission basis that was industry standard. One day, a new CEO was hired. Shortly thereafter, the CEO called the salesperson into his office and advised him that he was cutting his commission by 30% because the salesperson was making too much money. In fact, the salesperson was making more than the new CEO. What followed? The salesperson terminated his employment with the company and went to work for a competitor. Sales plummeted! Like cutting a successful salesperson’s commission, it defies logic to cut the budget of a revenue-generating branch of the government. Time will tell if Commissioner Koskinen’s predictions will become a reality. It seems certain the budget cuts will result in:
- Lower tax collections; thereby negatively impacting any chances of reducing the tax gap;
- Less taxpayer service; and
- Prolonged examination and appeal processes due to IRS staffing challenges.
Taxpayers and tax advisors will need to be patient in their encounters with the IRS. The Service’s ability to carry out its mission—to provide “taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all” has been significantly hindered by the budget cuts.
Larry J. Brant
Larry J. Brant is a Shareholder in Foster Garvey, a law firm based out of the Pacific Northwest, with offices in Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Washington, D.C.; New York, New York, Spokane, Washington; and Beijing, China. Mr. Brant practices in the Portland office. His practice focuses on tax, tax controversy and transactions. Mr. Brant is a past Chair of the Oregon State Bar Taxation Section. He was the long-term Chair of the Oregon Tax Institute, and is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Portland Tax Forum. Mr. Brant has served as an adjunct professor, teaching corporate taxation, at Northwestern School of Law, Lewis and Clark College. He is an Expert Contributor to Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Catalyst. Mr. Brant is a Fellow in the American College of Tax Counsel. He publishes articles on numerous income tax issues, including Taxation of S Corporations, Reasonable Compensation, Circular 230, Worker Classification, IRC § 1031 Exchanges, Choice of Entity, Entity Tax Classification, and State and Local Taxation. Mr. Brant is a frequent lecturer at local, regional and national tax and business conferences for CPAs and attorneys. He was the 2015 Recipient of the Oregon State Bar Tax Section Award of Merit.
Upcoming Speaking Engagements
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," New York University 78th Institute on Federal TaxationNew York, NY, 10.24.19
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," Oregon Society of Certified Public Accountants (OSCPA) 2019 Northwest Federal Tax ConferencePortland, OR, 10.28.19
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be a Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, but It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," New York University 78th Institute on Federal TaxationSan Francisco, CA, 11.14.19
- "The Oregon Corporate Activity Tax," Oregon Society of Certified Public Accountants (OSCPA) 2020 OSCPA State & Local Tax ConferencePortland, OR, 1.6.20
- "The Road Between Subchapter C and Subchapter S – It May Be A Well-Traveled Two-Way Thoroughfare, But It Isn’t Free of Potholes and Obstacles," The J. Nelson Young Tax InstituteChapel Hill, NC, 4.23.2020-4.24.2020