Duff on Hospitality Law

Google captured most of the online travel industry’s headlines this past week as it seeks to “balance” the competing interests of regulators, on the one hand, and intermediaries and direct sellers, on the other hand. As long as traditional search maintains its outsized influence on online travel, the outcome of these discussions will have a significant effect on the industry. Whether AI makes irrelevant this entire controversy remains to be seen – for now.

• • Closed Door Negotiations Produce No Definitive Solution for Google. This past week the European Commission conducted two days of closed door workshops between Google and online intermediaries and direct sellers from the retail and travel industries. At issue were Google’s latest proposals for presenting search results in compliance with the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) (or at least Google’s interpretation of the DMA). Failure to reach a solution will likely lead the EU to impose significant fines against Google.
    
    Two options were presented at the closed door meetings. The first option placed intermediaries at the top of search results where users could open an accordion style listing of the intermediary’s products and services. Under this first option, direct sellers could only place links within the intermediaries’ search results. The second option featured a box (below and separate from the intermediaries) where direct sellers could place links to their products and services. Between the two presented options, direct sellers generally favored the second option though questions around which sellers are featured in the box, how sellers are ranked, how sellers’ content is sourced and how much content can be displayed remain unanswered.
    
    Google’s latest proposals underscore the challenging position that hoteliers find themselves. While Google is understandably motivated to avoid significant penalties under the DMA, its interpretation of the DMA, specifically, the requirement that it not discriminate against competing service providers (e.g., travel intermediaries) is leading it to favor competing intermediaries (e.g., Booking.com / Expedia) over hoteliers, who are owed, at best, an obligation to be treated fairly.